DOES BUSH REALLY SUCK?

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
63
Tokens
I see many people on this board posting Bush sucks and he be a bad president.I really don't understand why americans and non-americans think he be a bad man.

Without Bush things might have been worse for everybody in the world.
But I bless him for what he be doing.He a good man.

I only wish some day everybody be loving and peacing one another.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Check out this nimrod. Kuwait, this is why I love the Rx. I can laugh out loud at least once a day.

wil.
893Cobra-thumb.gif
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
LMAO Musa
applaudit.gif
applaudit.gif
applaudit.gif
applaudit.gif


This guy would have been on "last comic standing" if he weren't out slant drilling
1036316054.gif
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
Without Bush things might have been worse for everybody in the world...He a good man.


How do you know this, almighty NostraCrackhead?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
774
Tokens
Here's why Bush sucks. While W was over there chasing Saddam, Osama bin Laden and al-Quida (IMO the biggest threats to the security of Americans) have probably been plotting another terrorist attack on the USA.

Don't get me wrong I support our troops, but Saddam should have been ousted during the first Gulf War.

Sooner or later Iraq would have become a threat, but it's been almost 2 years since 9-11 and Bin Laden is yet to be held accountable.

Let me make this clear. Unless George W Bush gets Osama Bin Laden he has failed. Now you Bush supporters spin it any way you want, but the truth will stand.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Good post. But expect someone to blame this on Bill Clinton or Al Gore, guarenteed.

wil.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
774
Tokens
Wilheim.......Sure they will. I guess the truth hurts. And the truth is Osama bin Laden has been running around thumbing his nose at George Bush and The United States for 2 years now. I wish somebody could explain to me how they consider this President such a success. Oh yes I forgot he mopped up a mess that should've been cleaned up 12 years ago by Dad.

God bless our young men and women around the world.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Quick question, why the broken English here in the political forum and perfect English in the Horse racing froum? Know what I mean?


Mildly Insane posted August 05, 2003 03:16 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did not get a chance to finish.But the racing is very competitive here.Pat Eddery use to ride heavy at the track but he is getting too old.


Does anybody know the trainer Jeanie Sadine from Calf.? I might have spelled her name wrong?

My favorite jockey in the states is Rick Wilson.

posted August 05, 2003 03:20 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLUEein Throbber+ you throbbing on your joint.SWALLOW BOY!


Gamblers Anonymous is for fvckin white trash losers that have no fvckin money left like your white ass!


Fvck you and your family of degenerates.Take my CLOWN and shove it up your mothers wide kunt---dic face!


Mildly Insane posted August 05, 2003 03:44 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am going to Gambler Anonymous tonight, would you girls like to go with me?

Sounds like fun doesn't it?

Mildly insane is not right----

So whats up Musa? Seems to me this is an old act.

wil.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,729
Tokens
As much as Saddam should have been ousted in the first Gulf war, Osama should have been taken when he was offered to us during Clinton's time. Not turned down.

Thats for you wil.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
I guess you are looking for an argument. To be very honest with you I am not familiar with any instance of BinLaden be offered to Clinton. I am busy handicapping baseball and do not have the time nor the inclination to research the alleged offering. I will say this OK. if you say so, great, your right. Happy?

wil.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,729
Tokens
Not really looking for an argument. My post was more in reaction towards bunyon, I only mentioned you cause of the clinton remark.

If your interested in the topic, and maybe in learning something new, here is an source from the Drudge Report:

http://www.hench.net/2001/z113001a.htm
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
You made the case for the Clinton Administration.

From Washington Post Article:

The Clinton administration struggled to find a way to accept the offer in secret contacts that stretched from a meeting at a Rosslyn hotel on March 3, 1996, to a fax that closed the door on the effort 10 weeks later. Unable to persuade the Saudis to accept bin Laden, and lacking a case to indict him in U.S. courts at the time, the Clinton administration finally gave up on the capture.


As far as <A HREF="http://www.sudan.net" TARGET=_blank>Sudan.Net
</A> Goes sorry, ya think they may have a slight bias?


wil.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,729
Tokens
"As far as Sudan.Net Goes sorry, ya think they may have a slight bias?"

I guess the sources they use are biased as well."

1 "The Osama Files", 'Vanity Fair', December 2001, pp 50-55.

2 These offers had also been documented in "Resentful West Spurned
Sudan's Key Terror Files", 'The Observer' (London), 30 September 2001,
and "US Rejected Sudanese Files on al-Qaeda", 'The Financial Times'
(London), 30 November 2001.

3 For a critique of the Clinton Administration's Sudan policy, see
David Hoile, 'Farce Majeure: The Clinton Administration's Sudan Policy
1993-2000', The European-Sudanese Public Affairs Council, London, 2000
(available at www.espac.org).
4 See, for example, "In '96, Sudan Offered to Arrest bin Laden",
'International Herald Tribune', 4 October 2001.

5 "Desperately Seeking Sudan", 'Vanity Fair', March 2002, p.34-35.

6 'The Independent' (London), 17 September 1993.

7 See, "Decision to Strike Factory in Sudan Based Partly on
Surmise", 'The Washington Post', 21 September 1998; and "Sudan Attack
Blamed on US Blunders", 'The Times' (London), 22 September 1998.

8 See, "'96, Sudan Offered to Arrest bin Laden", 'International
Herald Tribune', 4 October 2001.
9 "US Missed Three Chances to Seize Bin Laden", 'The Sunday Times
(London), 6 January 2002.



The fact is that they refused him when they had the opportunity. the claim that they couldnt have indicted him is extremely questionable.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,149
Messages
13,564,596
Members
100,752
Latest member
gamebet888host
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com